A poster, invitation, and program for the lecture David Reinfurt Explains Naïve Set Theory Using an Overhead Projector. There are many references to the imagery used in the DOT DOT DOT article, which is a transcription of the original lecture.
I chose the incomplete circle to represent the idea of Naïve Set Theory, in reference to the phrase The set of all sets is always, itself, incomplete, and also for its great visual impact.
The invitation fits in the top left of the poster. However, it does not complete it. This plays on the idea of a complete set vs. an always incomplete set.
The program is a script (or possibly transcript) for the advertised lecture, which was based on the article, which was a transcript of the original lecture. This is a reference to a visual representation of one of Paul Halmos' arguments about proofs, and the idea of a repeating process that is never complete. This idea is also represented on the cover of the program.
Preliminary concept mapping:
